based on a quick look, my reaction is the same, unless they have some very interesting Archetype => Schema transformation.
On 25/01/2016 14:25, [email protected] wrote:
I talked about this approach with a colleague from China during MEDINFO. The problem is your schema grows with your archetypes. Also, that storing data from many templates that don't use all the fields in the archetype, will generate sparse tables (lots of null columns). I told him it was easier to do an ORM from the IM, because the schema doesn't change and allows to store data from any archetype/template. But they already have a system working this way.
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
