Hi,
I got an idea when reading the nice story from Heather on LinkedIn. In
fact it is hers idea, but in a opposing way.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/journey-interoperability-part-i-heather-leslie
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/journey-interoperability-part-ii-heather-leslie
I wonder in how far it is feasible and useful to create archetypes from
SNOMED concepts, it would be possible to generate them, with attributes
and so on.
In a few hours time, one would have a complete forest with archetypes,
including ontology in more languages.
Maybe some smart handling, filtering, combining can create a better
collection, also looking at the paths, so that there are similar paths
for similar situations, to keep the number of different datapoints low,
which can help creating a faster key-value storage.
I don't know how it is about copyright, with members, and licensing,
that should be looked at.
The argument that SNOMED is fragmented should not count, I think
(however without having an expertise on this), because, when working
with handwritten archetypes will always be incomplete and fragmented.
Bert
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
