One option might be simply to do a per FHIR and 'hardwire' code + code
system, alongside units. This would retain backward compatibility. It would
prevent us using DV_TEXT features like mapping but in many respects that
might not be a bad thing.

Ian

Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
office +44 (0)1536 414994
skype: ianmcnicoll
email: i...@freshehr.com
twitter: @ianmcnicoll

Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org
Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
Director, HANDIHealth CIC
Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL

On 18 May 2016 at 10:22, Ian McNicoll <i...@freshehr.com> wrote:

> Hi Grahame,
>
> For the use case raised, I agree, but there other considerations e.g. Dose
> units and other non-UCUM code use - in the UK there is a desire to use
> SNOMED terms for dose units.
>
> FHIR has human + code + system for quantity units, I think?
>
> Ian
>
>
> Dr Ian McNicoll
> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
> office +44 (0)1536 414994
> skype: ianmcnicoll
> email: i...@freshehr.com
> twitter: @ianmcnicoll
>
> Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org
> Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
> Director, HANDIHealth CIC
> Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
>
> On 18 May 2016 at 10:11, Grahame Grieve <graha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That's overkill - just have two fields, human and computable units.
>>
>> Grahame
>>
>> On 18 May 2016, at 7:05 PM, Daniel Karlsson <daniel.karls...@liu.se>
>> wrote:
>>
>> So, right now the DV_QUANTITY.units is a String, perhaps it should be
>> DV_CODED_TEXT?
>>
>> /Daniel
>>
>> On 2016-05-18 10:25, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote:
>>
>> This imposes a larger implementation burden on the systems who will have
>> to be able to read UCUM codes and show the corresponding symbol instead of
>> the code, which in many cases is not readable to clinicians.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Karlsson, PhD, sr lecturer
>> Department of Biomedical Engineering/Health informatics
>> Linköping university
>> SE-58185 Linköping
>> Sweden
>> Ph. +46 708350109, Skype: imt_danka, Hangout: daniel.e.karls...@gmail.com
>>
>> <daniel_karlsson.vcf>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
>>
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
>>
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to