Hi Pablo
can you raise a PR for this, with some summary of the changes you think
are needed?
thanks
- thomas
On 14/07/2016 05:16, pablo pazos wrote:
Hi Heath, thanks for taking the time to answer, this is really useful
and I think your comments should be included in the specs as examples
of how the instruction/action interaction and the effect of that
interaction on the ISM should work.
First it makes total sense for me to have INITIAL as the current state
when no ACTION was recorded for the INSTRUCTION. And it also makes
sense to include a "placeholder" ACTION (might not have much info but
the next state) for INSTRUCTIONS that need to be on PLANNED when the
INSTRUCTION is created (like the medication case).
About 3.1 I was thinking of a case where the event of creating the
INSTRUCTION also includes the coordination/scheduling of ACTIONs that
will be performed. I think this is just another case of my previous
paragraph: we need an ACTION to change the state to SCHEDULED.
Thanks a lot!
--
Kind regards,
Eng. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez
http://cabolabs.com <http://cabolabs.com/es/home>
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
