Op 12-9-2016 om 8:32 schreef Diego Boscá:
sure thing, that's why we need standard expressions
Maybe I don't understand your point. But what I make of it, is that you
are referring to the ever lasting discussion about a standardset of
archetypes, or every medical institution making its own.
SCT can maybe also solve this point, when every archetype has a post
coordinated expression in it which represents the archetype, all
information will be machine processable/understandable.
At least, that is the way SCT wants to go, I cannot judge in how far
this succeeds, but it succeeds better then OpenEHR does without SCT, I
think.
2016-09-12 8:27 GMT+02:00 Bert Verhees <[email protected]>:
Op 11-9-2016 om 20:32 schreef Diego Boscá:
In practical terms however, you can't
always expect to have all the access that you want to a given external
service. e.g. I was banned from W3C once for launching a
transformation (more like 10k...) that depended on a online schema.
A hospital can run its own SCT service (in member countries, this is free),
and a hospital which has a large network problem is in big problems,
independent from the fact if it uses SCT.
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
