Dear Grahame, I modeled ICF to an archetype for my ice bucket challenge, but forgot to publish on CKM. Do you need this?
Shinji Kobayashi 2016-09-12 23:37 GMT+09:00 Grahame Grieve < grah...@healthintersections.com.au>: > FHIR terminology servers can (and mostly do) handle all of those > terminologies, though I don't know if anyone has handled ICF in practice. > > And expansions can preserve is-a relationships if you want, though... life > is complicated and the answer is not automatically 'yes' > > Grahame > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Thomas Beale <thomas.be...@openehr.org> > wrote: > >> >> we also still need a standard approach for non-SNOMED CT terminologies, >> such as ICDx, ICPC, ICF, LOINC and a hundred others... does anyone know of >> progress on this issue? >> >> - thomas >> >> On 12/09/2016 07:32, Diego Boscá wrote: >> >>> sure thing, that's why we need standard expressions >>> >>> 2016-09-12 8:27 GMT+02:00 Bert Verhees <bert.verh...@rosa.nl>: >>> >>>> Op 11-9-2016 om 20:32 schreef Diego Boscá: >>>> >>>>> In practical terms however, you can't >>>>> always expect to have all the access that you want to a given external >>>>> service. e.g. I was banned from W3C once for launching a >>>>> transformation (more like 10k...) that depended on a online schema. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_ >> lists.openehr.org >> > > > > -- > ----- > http://www.healthintersections.com.au / grah...@healthintersections.com.au > / +61 411 867 065 > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr- > technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
