One solution would be to do everything on SCT and use mappings to the other terminologies (most are really classifications and have a much simpler internal structure).
Sent from my LG Mobile ------ Original message------ From: Thomas Beale Date: Mon, Sep 12, 2016 05:33 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Subject:Re: SV: More generic reference model we also still need a standard approach for non-SNOMED CT terminologies, such as ICDx, ICPC, ICF, LOINC and a hundred others... does anyone know of progress on this issue?- thomasOn 12/09/2016 07:32, Diego Boscá wrote:> sure thing, that's why we need standard expressions>> 2016-09-12 8<tel:2016-09-12%208>:27 GMT+02:00 Bert Verhees :>> Op 11-9-2016 om 20:32 schreef Diego Boscá:>>> In practical terms however, you can't>>> always expect to have all the access that you want to a given external>>> service. e.g. I was banned from W3C once for launching a>>> transformation (more like 10k...) that depended on a online schema.>>_______________________________________________openEHR-technical mailing [email protected]<mailto:%[email protected]>p://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org>
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
