hi Daniel I'll listen to this discussion with interest. I expect that the answer will be: same functional needs as already covered by FHIR terminology services, but there's some additional information features that are needed to enable seamless integration.
Grahame On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Daniel Karlsson <daniel.karls...@liu.se> wrote: > Dear All, > > while thinking about terminology server requirements for openEHR systems > I would like to ask all openEHR implementers about experiences of > different solutions. Are there any experiences of using openEHR systems > with e.g. the FHIR terminology services, CTS2, Ocean TQL, homebrew, etc? > What are the use cases when the terminology servers are used (e.g. > design time, data entry, querying, etc.)? What are the "terminological > queries" that are used/needed (e.g. subsumption testing, subset > membership, subset expansion, etc.)? > > Thanks, > Daniel > > -- > > Daniel Karlsson, PhD, sr lecturer > Department of Biomedical Engineering/Health informatics > Linköping university > SE-58185 Linköping > Sweden > Ph. +46 708350109, Skype: imt_danka, Hangout: daniel.e.karls...@gmail.com > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr- > technical_lists.openehr.org > -- ----- http://www.healthintersections.com.au / grah...@healthintersections.com.au / +61 411 867 065
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
