right. Good argument from evidence for the UID. Want to create a PR with
these notes?
Not sure about mixing URIs with UIDs... OTOH, usually easy to detect by
parsing.
- thomas
On 19/12/2016 09:22, Heath Frankel wrote:
I think it should be a strong recommendation rather than mandatory
considering it is currently optional and the need for backward
compatibility.
I also think it maybe difficult to apply consistently in some cases
such as feeder data. There are cases in CDA profiles where there are
mandatory IDs and you have to populate it with something but then need
to some how retain this same ID over revisions etc.
I also think a uri should be an allowed type of UID to support ids
that are not guids and possibly associated with real world ids such as
lab result ids, etc.
Regards
Heath
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
