I believe that ISO 13606 renewal has proposed uuid to be made optional, but they are still there
El 18/12/2016 23:23, "Heath Frankel" <heath.fran...@oceaninformatics.com> escribió: > I think it should be a strong recommendation rather than mandatory > considering it is currently optional and the need for backward > compatibility. > I also think it maybe difficult to apply consistently in some cases such > as feeder data. There are cases in CDA profiles where there are mandatory > IDs and you have to populate it with something but then need to some how > retain this same ID over revisions etc. > I also think a uri should be an allowed type of UID to support ids that > are not guids and possibly associated with real world ids such as lab > result ids, etc. > > Regards > > Heath > > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 8:35 AM +1030, "Thomas Beale" < > thomas.be...@openehr.org> wrote: > > >> I also think that would be a good idea, since ENTRY = clinical >> statement. We could make it an openEHR rule. >> >> - thomas >> >> >> On 14/12/2016 00:24, Ian McNicoll wrote: >> > There may be some advantages in routine application of uid at ENTRY level. >> > >> > Ian >> > Dr Ian McNicoll >> > mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 <+44%207752%20097859> >> > office +44 (0)1536 414994 <+44%201536%20414994> >> > skype: ianmcnicoll >> > email: i...@freshehr.com >> > twitter: @ianmcnicoll >> > >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing >> listopenEHR-technical@lists.openehr.orghttp://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >> >> > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr- > technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
