I agree, that's an interesting idea. I have not put any thought into it,
but it's worth investigating. But we need to be clear on what problem is
being solved here. Is it improvements in medico-legal standard of proof,
or something else? What is the economic driver, and why are the current
mechanisms (signing and versioning) not good enough?
- thomas
On 13/11/2017 14:02, Bert Verhees wrote:
Thomas, one more remark, I remember the task-planning-specification
where you have been working on, and on which you planning to give a
presentation in London soon.
It is there where I thought there could be an excellent example of
implementation of blockchain. Because it is about a processing model,
state-machine, decisions, how good would it be for a performer to be
able to prove: a decision taken on information or having taken a step,
or other cicrumstances, by implementing the blockchain mechanism?
That would just be a classical use case for which blockchain was
invented.
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
