> > > Agreed, but a third party that would just be in charge of making certain > that the blockchain is unaltered has nothing to do with the business > involved. It is a technical trusted party, and there is no true reason it > should be expensive (for example, it could publish the hash of the > blockchain at every growing stages, so that anybody can check if currently > published blockchain is trustable). > > It has nothing in common with a Ministry of Health or any other "bag of > technocrats" (just kidding, of course). >
Doesn't it? I suspect that might be true in a theoretical technical sense, but I expect that it will prove not to be correct in the real world Grahame
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
