Hi David, yes I was involved :)
Evelyn presented a document called Book of Knowledge, which tried to
analyze/define different contexts and aspects of different roles people can
play using openEHR, the skills needed for an openEHR related job, and some
topics that should be part of training/education programs ("program" in
terms of courses and their internal organization of topics). On that
opportunity I acted as a reviewer/editor of the BoK.
I think the BoK was an excellent start for a full fledged program
("program" in terms of people organizing, validating, endorsing and
certificating courses, trainers and students), but in practical terms it
might be to ambitious and had a huge scope that can't be handled by the low
budget we have at the Foundation.
Some months ago people from the board started to propose a the need of a
practical approach and way smaller scope, but someone has to define that.
After talking a lot with Hildi, Koray, and Heather, Hildi proposed a new
plan of action and presented that to the board. This time I also acted as a
reviewer/editor, as well as others. Hildi is actually leading this new
effort.
I think after the board approve the document presented by Hildi, that
should be opened to the community for transparency and feedback. The nice
thing is, maybe my biggest contribution to the doc, is that includes a plan
of action for the first 12 months of the new education program (was never
formally established), that includes, among other things, to have some
guidelines for trainers to coordinate/standardize parts of the training
they (we) give, and how the endorsement of trainers should be handled by
the foundation and the related responsibilities of the education program in
assessing and endorse training proposals. It would be great if in a couple
of years we can have people offering training that is formally endorsed by
the openEHR foundation. This of course will be also a filter for people
offering openEHR training that doesn't have any experience with it and
never participated in the community, sadly there are cases.
Hope this gives a little background of the education program, what's going
on, and what are the next steps.
Best,
Pablo.
PS: I think after the program is formally established, we'll open
postulations to add more members, as we do with the SEC.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:37 AM, David Moner <[email protected]> wrote:
> [Although this is a transversal topic to openEHR, I send it to the
> technical list, as it is the most active]
>
> Hello,
>
> Some time ago (I think it was in 2015), there was some movement towards
> formalizing an Education Program about openEHR. I thing Evelyn Hovenga
> and Pablo Pazos were involved.
> There have not been news about this, so I'm curious if it is still active.
> If not, I think it is more important than ever, and we should retake it.
>
> In the past I was responsible of (trying to) develop a similar program
> inside the EN 13606 Association, so I'm happy to share the strategies we
> had there, and to participate in developing an openEHR education and
> certification plan.
>
> Best regards,
> David
>
>
> --
> David Moner Cano
>
> Web: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner
> Twitter: @davidmoner
> Skype: davidmoner
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-
> technical_lists.openehr.org
>
>
--
*Ing. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez*
[email protected]
+598 99 043 145
skype: cabolabs
Subscribe to our newsletter <http://eepurl.com/b_w_tj>
<https://cabolabs.com/>
http://www.cabolabs.com
https://cloudehrserver.com
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
