thanks

regards

Dileep V S
*Founder*
HealtheLife Ventures LLP
m: +91 9632888113
a: 106, Innovation Centre, IIIT, Electronics City, Bangalore 560100
w: healthelife.in  e: dil...@healthelife.in

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Peter Gummer <peter.gum...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Dileep,
>
> Right-click the node and select the Clone option. Then rename the
> duplicate of the node.
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
>
> On 20 Aug 2018, at 15:03, Dileep V S <dil...@healthelife.in> wrote:
>
> Dear Peter,
>
> Thanks for your reply. However I am not sure I fully understand the logic
> of this.
>
> OpenEHR has a way to represent multi occurrence nodes (by appending 0, 1
> etc to the path) such that the paths will remain unique. This should work
> even when the mode is constrained with a name as well. May be I am missing
> something here.
>
> I am not sure what you mean by cloning the node? Can this be done in
> Template designer? if yes how
>
> regards
>
>
>
> Dileep V S
> *Founder*
> HealtheLife Ventures LLP
> m: +91 9632888113
> a: 106, Innovation Centre, IIIT, Electronics City, Bangalore 560100
> w: healthelife.in  e: dil...@healthelife.in
>
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Peter Gummer <peter.gum...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dileep,
>>
>> Yes, this is expected. The behaviour was first noticed about 10 years
>> ago, and initially it was reported as a bug. After some thought we realised
>> that it’s the correct behaviour. I found it incredibly annoying too!
>>
>> My memory of the exact reasoning is poor, after all of these years; but I
>> think it’s something like this:
>>
>>
>>    1. Initially, the name of the archetype node is unconstrained. As a
>>    consequence, any name would be valid for this node. Therefore, there’s an
>>    unlimited number of unique paths to the data that could be stored at this
>>    node’s path: for example, at1234[name = “a”], at1234[name =
>>    “b”], at1234[name = “c”], etc.
>>    2. In the template, when you constrain the archetype node to a single
>>    specific name, there is only one possible path to the the node: for
>>    example, at1234[name=“whatever name you’ve constrained it to”]. There’s
>>    only one possible unique path to this. Therefore, the maximum
>>     occurrences possible is 1.
>>
>>
>> Essentially, this arises because there has to be one unique path to each
>> node in the data. This is important so that each data node can be
>> identified unambiguously within the EHR.
>>
>> There is a workaround, however. (But again, my memory may be inaccurate,
>> so please forgive me if this isn’t quite right or complete.) To allow
>> multiple occurrences, you need to clone the node. Then you can rename the
>> clone. Although the renamed clone will be single-occurrence, this will
>> retain the original node as multiple occurrences. Or at least I think this
>> is how it works — it’s been quite a few years!
>>
>> I have an even vaguer recollection that ADL 2.0 may have resolved this in
>> a more satisfactory way. Perhaps Thomas or someone can elucidate.
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> On 19 Aug 2018, at 20:24, Dileep V S <dil...@healthelife.in> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am observing a strange behavior in the template designer and whated to
>> check if this is the expected behavior and if not how to manage it.
>>
>> In any template, when ever I rename any archetypes, their occurrence gets
>> set to [0..1] automatically (single occurrence). The options for selecting
>> multiple occurrences is no more available.
>>
>> Have anybody else noticed this problem? Is there any way to work around
>> this as some of these archetypes need to be multiple occurrences
>>
>> Please see screenshots attached for reference
>>
>> regards
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_
>> lists.openehr.org
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-
> technical_lists.openehr.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-
> technical_lists.openehr.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to