On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 9:41 AM Ross Burton <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 17:38, Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I added the following to the wiki: > > > > '''Inactive-Upstream [lastcommit: when (and/or) lastrelease: when]''' > > - The upstream is no longer available. This typically means a defunct > > project > > where no activity has happened for a long time - measured in years. To > > make > > that judgement, it is recommended to look at not only when the last > > release > > happened, but also when the last commit happened, and whether newly > > made bug > > reports and merge requests since that time receive no reaction. It is > > also > > recommended to add any relevant links to the commit message where the > > inactivity > > can be clearly seen. > > > > https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines#Patch_Header_Recommendations:_Upstream-Status > > If we're adding a new one, can I suggest we remove Accepted? > > A patch is either submitted to upstream but hasn't been merged > (Submitted), or the patch is taken from upstream (Backport). Accepted > makes no sense.
Agreed, one less number of states to keep track of is always better. > > Ross > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1402): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1402 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/87612566/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
