> Op 5 feb 2026, om 16:12 heeft Ross Burton <[email protected]> het volgende 
> geschreven:
> 
> On 31 Jan 2026, at 14:49, Koen Kooi via lists.openembedded.org 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 2026-01-30 at 13:20 +0800, hongxu via lists.openembedded.org 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Would you please approve to add this layer to
>>>>> https://git.yoctoproject.org/, I will maintain
>>>>> meta-ollama for recipe uprev and bug fix
>>>> Thanks for sharing this, it looks really interesting and I like the
>>>> idea of it a lot.
>> 
>> Great timing as well :) I’m currently at FOSDEM asking around how people 
>> would feel about a meta-ai layer that would have various bits in it: tflite, 
>> onnx-runtime, llama.cpp and other things that need compilation.
>> 
>> At the OE BoF this morning I was pointed at this thread, so I’ll hook into 
>> that to ask:
>> 
>> How would people feel about a layer that combines at least the runtimes and 
>> has active maintainers?
>> 
>> The amount of ai/ml recipes I touch daily has grown too large to stuff in in 
>> the qcom-distro layer, but are also to spread out in other (vendor) layers 
>> to include by default.
> 
> I agree with other comments that a hyper-focused meta-ollama isn’t ideal, 
> considering that there are many pieces and they’ll often get 
> mixed-and-matched by different people.
> 
> Of course, the alternative of “meta-oe but for AI” isn’t ideal either, as 
> whilst meta-oe is very accepting of new recipes it is arguably _too_ 
> accepting: there’s a lot of unmaintained and unbuildable software in there (I 
> acknowledge that recent changes to build meta-oe in the AB has managed to 
> clear out a lot of the utterly broken recipes).
> 
> I’m wondering if Hongxu and Koen would be open to co-maintaining a meta-ai 
> (better name ideas welcome, maybe meta-llm?) layer with strict policies. For 
> example:
> 
> - Full automated build testing before patches are merged, to ensure that 
> nothing breaks

I forgot to mention: Qualcomm will 'offer' or sponsor the CI for this layer. 
The exact form is up for discussion!

regards,

Koen
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#2250): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/2250
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117540395/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to