On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 at 13:14, Paul Barker via lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]> wrote: > I do think that we should review the choice of default init manager - we > can prioritise this after the LTS release is out.
I do have a couple points I'd like to make now: - the 'make systemd the default' movement is very good at having their wish known. At the same time, those pushing for it are also not doing a particularly good job of explaining *why*. It won't make testing and support for systemd in yocto any better: the test matrix treats both options as equal. It may make yocto's standard images more performant, secure and feature rich, but this does need to be written down and showcased. - let me be frank: once systemd does become the default, the next push will be for dropping sysvinit from the test matrix. Which I see as a step back: away from having interoperability and choice, and towards software monocultures and tyrannical vendors that lock you in and push you around. The reason I'm sticking with the yocto project is to make computing landscape better for everyone, which necessitates those freedoms; shipping products to the market and solving others' technical problems is a means to that end, not an end in itself. I appreciate not everyone sees it that way, or thinks in those categories. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#2263): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/2263 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117872790/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
