On Feb 18, 2026, at 07:40, Alexander Kanavin via lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 at 11:58, Richard Purdie via > lists.openembedded.org > <[email protected]> wrote: >> a) systemd is not well supported on some of our key supported targets >> (e.g. musl). I appreciate that is changing, we're not there yet though. > > This is how upstream sees the newly added musl support: > > This support for musl is provided without a promise of continued > support in future releases. We'll make the decision based on the > amount of work required to maintain the compatibility layer in > systemd, how many musl-specific bugs are reported, and feedback on > the desirability of this effort provided by users and distributions. > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/v259/NEWS#L534 > > To me this looks both non-committal and vaguely passive-aggressive. > This may change, but the issue is not musl support per se, it's > upstream's mindset about alternatives.
Might need to add D-Bus and "Linux workloads everywhere" to the list of divergences. https://fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event/NFNKEK-varlink-ipc-system-keynote/ https://amutable.com/blog/introducing-amutable Rich
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#2265): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/2265 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117872790/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
