On 8/26/2026 6:16 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and > know the content is safe. > > On Wed, 2026-08-26 at 14:45 -0700, Sumanth Gavini via lists.openembedded.org > wrote: >> RPM 6's fileattr script generator produces Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config >> for packages that call pkg-config in their scriptlets. Add >> /usr/bin/pkg-config as an explicit RPROVIDES in pkgconf so these >> file-path dependencies resolve correctly. >> Remove /usr/bin/pkg-config from nativesdk-sdk-provides-dummy.bb since >> pkgconf now provides it explicitly via RPROVIDES. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sumanth Gavini <[email protected]> >> --- >> meta/recipes-core/meta/nativesdk-sdk-provides-dummy.bb | 1 - >> meta/recipes-devtools/pkgconf/pkgconf_3.0.6.bb | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/meta/nativesdk-sdk-provides-dummy.bb >> b/meta/recipes-core/meta/nativesdk-sdk-provides-dummy.bb >> index 6075770bf0..37dad54409 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-core/meta/nativesdk-sdk-provides-dummy.bb >> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/meta/nativesdk-sdk-provides-dummy.bb >> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ DUMMYPROVIDES = "\ >> /bin/sh \ >> /bin/bash \ >> /usr/bin/env \ >> - /usr/bin/pkg-config \ >> libGL.so()(64bit) \ >> libGL.so \ >> " >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/pkgconf/pkgconf_3.0.6.bb >> b/meta/recipes-devtools/pkgconf/pkgconf_3.0.6.bb >> index 471433e7b5..0249c87878 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/pkgconf/pkgconf_3.0.6.bb >> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/pkgconf/pkgconf_3.0.6.bb >> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ HOMEPAGE = "http://pkgconf.org"; >> BUGTRACKER = "https://github.com/pkgconf/pkgconf/issues"; >> SECTION = "devel" >> PROVIDES += "pkgconfig" >> -RPROVIDES:${PN} += "pkgconfig" >> +RPROVIDES:${PN} += "pkgconfig /usr/bin/pkg-config" >> >> # The pkgconf license seems to be functionally equivalent to BSD-2-Clause >> or >> # ISC, but has different wording, so needs its own name. >> > > This reverts half of patch 5 in the series. Do we still need patch 5 at all? > > Do we need the RPROVIDES of /usr/bin/pkg-config if we have the pkg- > config dependency code in rpm disabled (e.g as in patch 16)? > > Cheers, > > Richard
Hi Richard, You're right on both points. With patch 16's __requires_exclude in place, nothing emits Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config or pkgconfig(...) anymore, so patches 5 and 10 should be redundant. I'd like to confirm this properly first, I'll run the oe-selftest cases (oe-selftest -r debuginfod.Debuginfod.test_debuginfod_native) without patches 5 and 10 and report back, then send v19 accordingly. -- # Sumanth Gavini # Wind River Linux
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#244445): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/244445 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/120947892/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
