On Sun Aug 23, 2026 at 5:57 PM CEST, Peter Marko via lists.openembedded.org 
wrote:
> From: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]>
>
> The regex excludes bogus old yyyymmdd tags which sort higher than real 
> versions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>
> (From OE-Core rev: 2a60e5db4460cd8ec99b43d8f2ff733ba509c373)
> Signed-off-by: Peter Marko <[email protected]>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-connectivity/slirp/libslirp_4.9.1.bb | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/slirp/libslirp_4.9.1.bb 
> b/meta/recipes-connectivity/slirp/libslirp_4.9.1.bb
> index 9f7005d709..50577fd4ae 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/slirp/libslirp_4.9.1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/slirp/libslirp_4.9.1.bb
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = 
> "file://COPYRIGHT;md5=bca0186b14e6b05e338e729f106db727"
>  
>  SRC_URI = 
> "git://gitlab.freedesktop.org/slirp/libslirp.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
>  SRCREV = "9c744e1e52aa0d9646ed91d789d588696292c21e"
> +UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX = "v(?P<pver>\d+(\.\d+)+)"
>  
>  DEPENDS = "glib-2.0"
>  

Hello Peter,

Thanks for the series. But, with regrets, I don't think it is acceptable
under the policy:
* 1&3/3 are not bug fixes (UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX is not used right
  now on stables)
* 2/3 is the upgrade. It contains: 
  "Changed: bootp: allow https for UEFI HTTP boot"
  and that is a feature change (even if, behind it there is only a one
  line change)

I think you did this backport to fix CVE-2026-9539. I think we'll have
to backport the fix, (like you did on scarthgap).

Thanks!
-- 
Yoann Congal
Smile ECS

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#245042): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/245042
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/120889692/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to