> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yoann Congal <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2026 10:28 AM
> To: Marko, Peter (FT D EU SK BFS1) <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [scarthgap][PATCH] systemd: patch CVE-2026-4105
> 
> On Sun Oct 4, 2026 at 9:52 AM CEST, Peter Marko wrote:
> >> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-ptest.bb b/meta/recipes-
> >> core/images/core-image-ptest.bb
> >> > index 72081f938de..024c69e9fda 100644
> >> > --- a/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-ptest.bb
> >> > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-ptest.bb
> >> > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ QB_MEM:virtclass-mcextend-python3-cryptography = "-
> m
> >> 5100"
> >> >  TEST_SUITES = "ping ssh parselogs ptest"
> >> >
> >> >  # Sadly at the moment the full set of ptests is not robust enough and
> sporadically
> >> fails in random places
> >> > -PTEST_EXPECT_FAILURE = "1"
> >> > +#PTEST_EXPECT_FAILURE = "1"
> >>    ^
> >> I don't think you meant to add this hunk to this patch.
> >
> > Yes, I'll send a v2 shortly.
> > For scarthgap it's important to run the testimage with this disabled as 
> > it's easy to
> miss failures otherwise.
> 
> You mean that they only trigger a warning like in this run:
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/?#/builders/29/builds/4784
> ... or something even more discreet?
> 
> Since I do consider ptests failures as errors, I may think about
> removing 'PTEST_EXPECT_FAILURE = "1"' from my runs (but I usually spot
> the warnings).

When I run with cve-check enabled, the warning is not that obvious between all 
those other ones...
I'll try to be more careful in the future.

> --
> Yoann Congal
> Smile ECS

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#247198): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/247198
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/121567717/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to