On 05/16/2011 12:51 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:08 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Saul Wold<[email protected]> wrote:
On 05/15/2011 11:19 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On May 14, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Saul Wold<[email protected]> wrote:
From: Saul Wold<[email protected]>
This proposes to move the YAFFS2-utils, older clutter-1.4
and older GCC version (4.3.3 and 3.4.4) as they are unused
and currently unbuildable.
Are we left with any GPLv2 version of gcc after this ?
Khem,
Is not having a GPLv2 version of gcc an issue? For the non-gplv3 version, my
understanding is to have an installed user-space for oe-core for a
non-development system, therefore gcc is not an issue.
there are certain parts of gcc which go onto target e.g. libgcc libstdc++
These have specific license exceptions allowing non-gpl code to use them
as system libraries though?
Richard is correct, there are exception for the runtime parts of GCC.
Sorry Khem, I was not catching to original gist of the question.
Sau!
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
