On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Saul Wold <saul.w...@intel.com> wrote: > On 05/16/2011 12:51 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:08 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Saul Wold<saul.w...@intel.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 05/15/2011 11:19 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On May 14, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Saul Wold<s...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> From: Saul Wold<s...@linux.intel.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> This proposes to move the YAFFS2-utils, older clutter-1.4 >>>>>> and older GCC version (4.3.3 and 3.4.4) as they are unused >>>>>> and currently unbuildable. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are we left with any GPLv2 version of gcc after this ? >>>>> >>>> Khem, >>>> >>>> Is not having a GPLv2 version of gcc an issue? For the non-gplv3 >>>> version, my >>>> understanding is to have an installed user-space for oe-core for a >>>> non-development system, therefore gcc is not an issue. >>>> >>> >>> there are certain parts of gcc which go onto target e.g. libgcc libstdc++ >> >> These have specific license exceptions allowing non-gpl code to use them >> as system libraries though? >> > Richard is correct, there are exception for the runtime parts of GCC. > Sorry Khem, I was not catching to original gist of the question.
exceptions yes but they are not same exceptions between GPLv2 and GPLv3 gcc. > > Sau! > >> Cheers, >> >> Richard >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core