On 6/9/11 10:34 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > > > 2011/6/9 Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com > <mailto:mark.ha...@windriver.com>> > > On 6/9/11 5:57 AM, Kang Kai wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > I am focus on eglibc itself compilation with disabling all the > > configurable options, right now eglibc can be compiled with disable all > > the configurable options. > > > > But when I build core-image-minimal in a clear new directory, some > > packages build failed and they need eglibc supports, such as > > core-image-minimal is simply to large of an image to see some of the > advantages > of the eglibc configuration. Realistically the advantages come on single > application or small (busybox + single application) systems. > > > Then again if you are in that usecase you're probably better off (spacewise) > using static linking
dynamical linking has the advantage of requiring less run-time memory. So multi-process, small systems are better in dynamic configurations then static. (Copy-On-Write) On-disk space is better static then dynamic. It's all trade-offs in the end. --Mark > Frans > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core