On Thursday 16 June 2011 10:35:25 Phil Blundell wrote: > These changes look like they will have a rather wider impact than just > the sato image. I'm not sufficiently au fait with connman to say > whether this is a good thing or not (although my immediate reaction to > adding extra RDEPENDS tends to be that it is not), but if they're going > to be added globally then the checkin comment ought to reflect that and > explain why it's being done.
Dongxiao, I'm somewhat in agreement in that I don't think we want to force ofono to be installed for people who only need connman. Ofono support in connman is a plugin, so we should be able to have this as a separate sub- package and then make only that depend on ofono. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
