On 6/20/11 2:41 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > Hi, > > I was building qt this weekend and I noticed this one: > > WARNING: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (40 to 62) on > /work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/qt4-embedded-4.7.3-r26.1/packages-split/qt4-embedded-tools/usr/bin/moc > WARNING: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (40 to 62) on > /work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/qt4-embedded-4.7.3-r26.1/packages-split/qt4-embedded-tools/usr/bin/uic > WARNING: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (40 to 62) on > /work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/qt4-embedded-4.7.3-r26.1/packages-split/qt4-embedded-tools/usr/bin/rcc > > Shouldn't that be a fatal error, shipping x86 binaries in arm packages?
There are a couple of very minor use cases where this may be necessary. So I'm wondering if we can put in an override mechanism that tells the system to make the QA a warning instead of an error for select packages. Otherwise, yes.. this should be an error. (The minor cases are primarily firmware loaded into off-board cards in PCI chasis and such.. occasionally these firmware are ELF and of an architecture not the same as the host.. it's rare, but I have seen it before.) --Mark > regards, > > Koen > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
