Op 20 jun 2011, om 15:55 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven: > On 6/20/11 8:31 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> Op 20 jun 2011, om 15:29 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven: >> >>> On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 08:23 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: >>>> (The minor cases are primarily firmware loaded into off-board cards in PCI >>>> chasis and such.. occasionally these firmware are ELF and of an >>>> architecture not >>>> the same as the host.. it's rare, but I have seen it before.) >>> >>> Shouldn't those firmware images just go in a separate package? > > Depends on how the system is configured.. Often I see them packaged with the > firmware loader -- which is the proper arch, etc.. > >> If we do that we can use INSANE_SKIP_firmwarepackage = True, which seems >> like a good solution. > > Ya, as long as we can skip -- or change it to a warning instead of an error.. > I > think we're good. Like I said, this is rare and unlikely to be an issue in > anything in oe-core, meta-oe or even the distributions based on oe-core.. but > I > have seen it in customer production environments before.
We have exactly 1 xorg driver in oe .dev that triggers it :) _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
