On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 21:09 +0800, Dexuan Cui wrote: > +This turned out to be a gcc's bug. See > +https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360513 > +http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333 > + > +Upstream gcc seems uninterested in the bug, so at present we can disable the > +option as a workaround. Thanks Ryan Hill for the investigation and the > +workaround patch.
I'm not sure it's fair to say that upstream gcc is uninterested. It doesn't appear that anybody has been willing or able to produce a testcase which will allow the gcc people to debug the problem. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
