On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 14:20 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 21:09 +0800, Dexuan Cui wrote: > > +This turned out to be a gcc's bug. See > > +https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360513 > > +http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333 > > + > > +Upstream gcc seems uninterested in the bug, so at present we can disable > > the > > +option as a workaround. Thanks Ryan Hill for the investigation and the > > +workaround patch. > > I'm not sure it's fair to say that upstream gcc is uninterested. It > doesn't appear that anybody has been willing or able to produce a > testcase which will allow the gcc people to debug the problem.
Agreed, it would be good if the gcc people could get a testcase to fix the problem. In the meantime I will take the workaround though. Cheers, RIchard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
