On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 13:13 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 13 jul 2011, om 13:08 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 10:03 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> >> Previously, libnss_hesiod et al. could get swallowed by the wildcarded
> >> glob in ${PN}-dev.
> >> Fix it by moving eglibc-extra-nss earlier in the PACKAGES and adjusting
> >> its FILES to ensure
> >> that the devel symlinks don't get caught.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-package.inc | 4 ++--
> >> meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.13.bb | 2 +-
> >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > Merged to master, thanks.
>
> That is missing a PR bump for eglibc 2.12
Oh yeah. Do we really need to keep 2.12 around still?
I also wonder if glibc 2.10 could/should be deleted now. That recipe
probably has a lot of the same issues that we've been fixing in eglibc
recently and it seems a bit of a waste of time to keep beating away at a
package that's four major versions out of date.
p.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
