On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 15:16 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 15:14 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> > Op 13 jul 2011, om 13:26 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven: >> > >> > > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 13:13 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> > >> Op 13 jul 2011, om 13:08 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: >> > >> >> > >>> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 10:03 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: >> > >>>> Previously, libnss_hesiod et al. could get swallowed by the >> > >>>> wildcarded glob in ${PN}-dev. >> > >>>> Fix it by moving eglibc-extra-nss earlier in the PACKAGES and >> > >>>> adjusting its FILES to ensure >> > >>>> that the devel symlinks don't get caught. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <[email protected]> >> > >>>> --- >> > >>>> meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-package.inc | 4 ++-- >> > >>>> meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.13.bb | 2 +- >> > >>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> > >>> >> > >>> Merged to master, thanks. >> > >> >> > >> That is missing a PR bump for eglibc 2.12 >> > > >> > > Oh yeah. Do we really need to keep 2.12 around still? >> > >> > It's the default for angstrom, dunno if that's a good enough reason :) >> >> Does Angstrom have any plans to switch to 2.13? >> >> Certainly we're not aware of issues with 2.13 and as such we should >> really consider phasing out 2.12 from OE-Core at least... > > How about glibc 2.10; is anybody still using that at all?
I think all glibc recipes should go away. > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
