On 07/25/2011 08:57 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 10:10 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>> --- a/meta/site/common-linux
>> +++ b/meta/site/common-linux
>> @@ -23,3 +23,6 @@ bash_cv_unusable_rtsigs=${bash_cv_unusable_rtsigs=no}
>> # mysql
>> ac_cv_sys_restartable_syscalls=${ac_cv_sys_restartable_syscalls=yes}
>> ac_cv_conv_longlong_to_float=${ac_cv_conv_longlong_to_float=yes}
>> +
>> +# rp-pppoe
>> +rpppoe_cv_pack_bitfields=${rpppoe_cv_pack_bitfields=rev}
>
> Is that really correct? Bitfield packing isn't an OS issue, it's
> primarily a question of compiler choice. For GCC I think it correlates
> with endianness; looking at what that test is doing, I'd expect you to
> get "reversed" on little-endian and "normal" on big-endian.
It's possible we're getting this, and have been getting this wrong on
big-endian targets but I haven't heard from Freescale this is failing
for them. I'm OK with dropping this bit out for now until we can
confirm this test on a BE machine.
--
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
