On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 10:10 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> --- a/meta/site/common-linux
> +++ b/meta/site/common-linux
> @@ -23,3 +23,6 @@ bash_cv_unusable_rtsigs=${bash_cv_unusable_rtsigs=no}
> # mysql
> ac_cv_sys_restartable_syscalls=${ac_cv_sys_restartable_syscalls=yes}
> ac_cv_conv_longlong_to_float=${ac_cv_conv_longlong_to_float=yes}
> +
> +# rp-pppoe
> +rpppoe_cv_pack_bitfields=${rpppoe_cv_pack_bitfields=rev}
Is that really correct? Bitfield packing isn't an OS issue, it's
primarily a question of compiler choice. For GCC I think it correlates
with endianness; looking at what that test is doing, I'd expect you to
get "reversed" on little-endian and "normal" on big-endian.
p.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
