On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Nitin A Kamble <[email protected]>
>
> for x86_64 multiple ABIs now have these new names for the TARGET_OS.
> Add entries for:
> linux-gnu32, linux-gnux32, linux-gnu64
>
> Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <[email protected]>
> ---
> meta/classes/insane.bbclass | 9 +++++++++
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
> index 5fb0d98..15e7fc7 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
> @@ -90,6 +90,15 @@ def package_qa_get_machine_dict():
> "microblaze": (47787, 0, 0, False,
> 32),
> "microblazeel": (47787, 0, 0, True,
> 32),
> },
> + "linux-gnu32" : {
> + "x86_64": (62, 0, 0, True,
> 32),
> + },
This one doesn't make sense to me. linux-gnu32 would be i586 (arch=3)
and not arch=62?
> + "linux-gnux32" : {
> + "x86_64": (62, 0, 0, True,
> 32),
> + },
This one is fine.
> + "linux-gnu64" : {
> + "x86_64": (62, 0, 0, True,
> 64),
> + },
> }
I'm not sure we need this either...
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core