Sorry to bother you but are you sure? "if this is a patch against angstrom on top of oe.dev then it should go to oe-devel list too"
meta-angstrom patches are not ontop of oe.dev On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Dmytriyenko, Denys <[email protected]> wrote: > He meant angstrom-devel and/or oe-devel, not oe-core. > > Denys > > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Joel A Fernandes" <[email protected]> > To: "Khem Raj" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer" > <[email protected]>, "Kooi, Koen" <[email protected]>, > "Dmytriyenko, Denys" <[email protected]> > Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH] angstrom-task-gnome: Added gedit to task-gnome > dependencies > Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 18:07 > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Jason Kridner <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> I see the README says this should be on the OE-core list, but maybe this >>> should go on the Angstrom list? >>> >> >> it should go to angstrom-devel list in anycase >> if this is a patch against angstrom on top of oe.dev then it should go >> to oe-devel list too. oe-core is not needed > > Hi Khem, just confirming that you mean meta-angstrom patches should go > to both oe-core and angstrom lists? > > Thanks, > Joel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
