On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Joel A Fernandes <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry to bother you but are you sure? > > "if this is a patch against angstrom on top of oe.dev then it should go > to oe-devel list too" > > meta-angstrom patches are not ontop of oe.dev >
yes meta-angstrom patches go to angstrom-devel list. No need to send them to oe-devel or oe-core mls unless there is some change that affects these other layers > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Dmytriyenko, Denys <[email protected]> wrote: >> He meant angstrom-devel and/or oe-devel, not oe-core. >> >> Denys >> >> >> ----- Reply message ----- >> From: "Joel A Fernandes" <[email protected]> >> To: "Khem Raj" <[email protected]> >> Cc: "Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer" >> <[email protected]>, "Kooi, Koen" <[email protected]>, >> "Dmytriyenko, Denys" <[email protected]> >> Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH] angstrom-task-gnome: Added gedit to task-gnome >> dependencies >> Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 18:07 >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Jason Kridner <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> I see the README says this should be on the OE-core list, but maybe this >>>> should go on the Angstrom list? >>>> >>> >>> it should go to angstrom-devel list in anycase >>> if this is a patch against angstrom on top of oe.dev then it should go >>> to oe-devel list too. oe-core is not needed >> >> Hi Khem, just confirming that you mean meta-angstrom patches should go >> to both oe-core and angstrom lists? >> >> Thanks, >> Joel >> > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
