On 10/04/2011 01:27 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 10/04/2011 04:08 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 10/04/2011 12:58 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
I'm about to start bringing some images I use from OE to OE-core. The
first issue I saw is there is no task-proper-tools in oe-core (where
oe-core means the set of layers created by the Angstrom setup scripts).

Philip,

Have you looked at task-core-basic, it is supposed to be more of a
desktop like set of tools, the idea being it's heavier weight than core,
will move to supporting the non-graphical part of LSB.

Another caveat for task-core-basic is that it's the largetest non-gplv3
task that is used by core-image-basic.

Does this task approach what you are looking for?

It looks like a start, but I notice it brings in rpm. I'm not sure if I
want that. I would have thought that the package manager would be a
distro decision.

That's a bug that I would certainly take a patch for, unless rpm is required as part of LSB, that will need to be verified.

Sau!

Philip



Sau!


Should I add task-proper-tools to meta-oe, or is there a better way to
add a full features set of tools to an image? Basically, the image is
more desktop like than embedded.

Philip

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core




_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core



_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to