Hi, Alexander: Thanks for the input, I will then try to investigate the rpm code for tweaking the values.
//Ming Liu 2017-10-02 13:37 GMT+02:00 Alexander Kanavin < [email protected]>: > On 10/02/2017 08:08 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >> From: Ming Liu <[email protected]> >> >> This patch aims to fix a kernel-devsrc rpm installation failure on >> target, I had sent the patch to libsolv upstream, but its maintainers >> rejected it with the reason: >> ... >> we probably want to sync these values with RPM code... >> ... >> >> I am not a rpm expert, would somebody please comment on this? Is this a >> issue also should be addressed in rpm? >> > > Note that they did not reject the pull request, but merely commented on > it; it is still open. > > What the upstream probably meant is that rpm could also be defining these > values somewhere, and so instead of just re-defining them blindly to > arbitrary values in libsolv, you should take them from rpm header files, or > otherwise figure out how the header limits are handled in rpm. > > Alex >
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
