Ping, this patch had been merged to libsolv upstream. //Ming Liu
2017-10-03 5:59 GMT+02:00 Ming Liu <[email protected]>: > Hi, Alexander: > > Thanks for the input, I will then try to investigate the rpm code for > tweaking the values. > > //Ming Liu > > 2017-10-02 13:37 GMT+02:00 Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux. > intel.com>: > >> On 10/02/2017 08:08 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> From: Ming Liu <[email protected]> >>> >>> This patch aims to fix a kernel-devsrc rpm installation failure on >>> target, I had sent the patch to libsolv upstream, but its maintainers >>> rejected it with the reason: >>> ... >>> we probably want to sync these values with RPM code... >>> ... >>> >>> I am not a rpm expert, would somebody please comment on this? Is this a >>> issue also should be addressed in rpm? >>> >> >> Note that they did not reject the pull request, but merely commented on >> it; it is still open. >> >> What the upstream probably meant is that rpm could also be defining these >> values somewhere, and so instead of just re-defining them blindly to >> arbitrary values in libsolv, you should take them from rpm header files, or >> otherwise figure out how the header limits are handled in rpm. >> >> Alex >> > >
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
