Hi Alejandro,

On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 8:02:07 AM NZDT Alejandro Enedino Hernandez 
Samaniego wrote:
> Its backwards compatible, in the way that the usage should be the same, 
> in this case, this sort of failures are expected, since the mentioned 
> packages: enum, readline, textutils no longer exist, and they should 
> never have existed in the first place, they were always required to get 
> a minimal python working, so they are now part of python(3)-core, which 
> means the dependencies are actually met but recipes which RDEPEND on 
> them should be modified , please see 
> https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=7aaffbede46ce352b91c7a5c5f825a6f3b5b1c2e
>  
> regarding some of the RDEPEND fixes on oe-core, I expect there should be 
> several like this for meta-python.

It seems to me we need to do one of two things:

A) Add explicit RPROVIDES so that the core package provides these things
for compatibility with existing recipes

or

B) Add something to the migration guide to explain what users need to do in
order to fix their recipes after this change - the staging area for these is on 
the wiki
(doesn't have to be fully fleshed out, just the bare details would be 
sufficient)
  https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/FutureMigrationGuide

Could you please take care of this?

Thanks,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to