On 1/12/18 7:45 PM, Christopher Larson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Alex Stewart <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > * Move the hwclock.sh initscript from the busybox recipe to util-linux. > This script is generally useful for distros that get their hwclock > implementation from sources other than busybox and we follow debian's > example by providing it in util-linux. > > :busybox/* > * Remove the busybox-hwclock package, as it no longer has a purpose. > * If busybox is configured to include hwclock, the busybox package will > RDEPEND on util-linux-hwclock-init. > > :util-linux/* > * Provide the hwclock.sh script in util-linux-hwclock-init, which can be > pulled by any packages that depend on its functionality. > * util-linux-hwclock RDEPENDS on util-linux-hwclock-init for its > initscript. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Stewart <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Acked-by: Haris Okanovic <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Acked-by: Adrian Ratiu <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Acked-by: Ken Sharp <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Natinst-ReviewBoard-ID: 214983, 215755 > > > Just a note that this will slow down the build for targets that wouldn’t > otherwise build the util-linux recipe.
there is initscripts recipes, perhaps thats a better place for this. > -- > Christopher Larson > kergoth at gmail dot com > Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus > Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
