Op 24 okt. 2011, om 16:10 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 15:37 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 24 okt. 2011, om 15:34 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 11:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
>>>> From: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> Adjust prefix.patch and delete resolve-sysroot.patch
>>>> since its already applied upstream
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../libtool/{libtool.inc => libtool-2.4.2.inc} | 26 +++++++++---
>>>> meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.inc | 13 ------
>>>> ...libtool-cross_2.4.bb => libtool-cross_2.4.2.bb} | 2 +-
>>>> ...btool-native_2.4.bb => libtool-native_2.4.2.bb} | 2 +-
>>>> ...nativesdk_2.4.bb => libtool-nativesdk_2.4.2.bb} | 2 +-
>>>> meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool/prefix.patch | 46
>>>> ++++++++++----------
>>>> .../libtool/libtool/resolve-sysroot.patch | 42
>>>> ------------------
>>>> .../libtool/{libtool_2.4.bb => libtool_2.4.2.bb} | 2 +-
>>>> 8 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
>>>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool.inc => libtool-2.4.2.inc}
>>>> (57%)
>>>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.inc
>>>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool-cross_2.4.bb =>
>>>> libtool-cross_2.4.2.bb} (98%)
>>>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool-native_2.4.bb =>
>>>> libtool-native_2.4.2.bb} (96%)
>>>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool-nativesdk_2.4.bb =>
>>>> libtool-nativesdk_2.4.2.bb} (97%)
>>>> delete mode 100644
>>>> meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool/resolve-sysroot.patch
>>>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool_2.4.bb => libtool_2.4.2.bb}
>>>> (94%)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool.inc
>>>> b/meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.2.inc
>>>> similarity index 57%
>>>> rename from meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool.inc
>>>> rename to meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.2.inc
>>>> index ef9095b..1f652ef 100644
>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool.inc
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.2.inc
>>>> @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
>>>> -SUMMARY = "Generic library support script"
>>>
>>> Why drop the SUMMARY field?
>>
>> What's the difference between SUMMARY and DESCRIPTION? And what happens if
>> both are set?
>
> SUMMARY is a one line 74? character summary of the package, DESCRIPTION
> is a multiple line stream of text containing a more verbose description.
> What happens to the data is package backend specific, I know RPM has
> uses for both. There was definitely discussion about this on the mailing
> list at the time, I'm not sure what if anything made it into the manuals
> but if its not there it should be added.
It seems to get OR'd:
meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass: summary = bb.data.getVar('SUMMARY',
localdata, True) or bb.data.getVar('DESCRIPTION', localdata, True) or "."
package_deb.bbclass: description =
bb.data.getVar('DESCRIPTION', localdata, True) or "."
meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass: summary = bb.data.getVar('SUMMARY',
localdata, True) or bb.data.getVar('DESCRIPTION', localdata, True) or "."
package_ipk.bbclass: description =
bb.data.getVar('DESCRIPTION', localdata, True) or "."
meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass: srcsummary = (bb.data.getVar('SUMMARY',
d, True) or bb.data.getVar('DESCRIPTION', d, True) or ".")
package_rpm.bbclass: srcdescription = bb.data.getVar('DESCRIPTION', d, True)
or "."
regards,
Koen
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
