On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 16:18 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 24 okt. 2011, om 16:10 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > > > On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 15:37 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Op 24 okt. 2011, om 15:34 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > >> > >>> On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 11:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > >>>> From: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>> Adjust prefix.patch and delete resolve-sysroot.patch > >>>> since its already applied upstream > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > >>>> --- > >>>> .../libtool/{libtool.inc => libtool-2.4.2.inc} | 26 +++++++++--- > >>>> meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.inc | 13 ------ > >>>> ...libtool-cross_2.4.bb => libtool-cross_2.4.2.bb} | 2 +- > >>>> ...btool-native_2.4.bb => libtool-native_2.4.2.bb} | 2 +- > >>>> ...nativesdk_2.4.bb => libtool-nativesdk_2.4.2.bb} | 2 +- > >>>> meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool/prefix.patch | 46 > >>>> ++++++++++---------- > >>>> .../libtool/libtool/resolve-sysroot.patch | 42 > >>>> ------------------ > >>>> .../libtool/{libtool_2.4.bb => libtool_2.4.2.bb} | 2 +- > >>>> 8 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-) > >>>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool.inc => libtool-2.4.2.inc} > >>>> (57%) > >>>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.inc > >>>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool-cross_2.4.bb => > >>>> libtool-cross_2.4.2.bb} (98%) > >>>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool-native_2.4.bb => > >>>> libtool-native_2.4.2.bb} (96%) > >>>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool-nativesdk_2.4.bb => > >>>> libtool-nativesdk_2.4.2.bb} (97%) > >>>> delete mode 100644 > >>>> meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool/resolve-sysroot.patch > >>>> rename meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/{libtool_2.4.bb => > >>>> libtool_2.4.2.bb} (94%) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool.inc > >>>> b/meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.2.inc > >>>> similarity index 57% > >>>> rename from meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool.inc > >>>> rename to meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.2.inc > >>>> index ef9095b..1f652ef 100644 > >>>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool.inc > >>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/libtool/libtool-2.4.2.inc > >>>> @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ > >>>> -SUMMARY = "Generic library support script" > >>> > >>> Why drop the SUMMARY field? > >> > >> What's the difference between SUMMARY and DESCRIPTION? And what happens if > >> both are set? > > > > SUMMARY is a one line 74? character summary of the package, DESCRIPTION > > is a multiple line stream of text containing a more verbose description. > > What happens to the data is package backend specific, I know RPM has > > uses for both. There was definitely discussion about this on the mailing > > list at the time, I'm not sure what if anything made it into the manuals > > but if its not there it should be added. > > > It seems to get OR'd: > > meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass: summary = bb.data.getVar('SUMMARY', > localdata, True) or bb.data.getVar('DESCRIPTION', localdata, True) or "." > package_deb.bbclass: description = > bb.data.getVar('DESCRIPTION', localdata, True) or "." > > meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass: summary = bb.data.getVar('SUMMARY', > localdata, True) or bb.data.getVar('DESCRIPTION', localdata, True) or "." > package_ipk.bbclass: description = > bb.data.getVar('DESCRIPTION', localdata, True) or "." > > meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass: srcsummary = > (bb.data.getVar('SUMMARY', d, True) or bb.data.getVar('DESCRIPTION', d, True) > or ".") > package_rpm.bbclass: srcdescription = bb.data.getVar('DESCRIPTION', d, > True) or "."
So the summary is SUMMARY if set, or DESCRIPTION if set else "." The description is DESCRIPTION if set else "." which was done to fall back to the case where recipes just set DESCRIPTION. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
