On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:52 AM Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Mark Hatle <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 6/15/18 7:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > >> >> > From: André Draszik <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> >> > > >> >> > Some projects are starting to use it. > >> >> > https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html > >> >> > > >> >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> >> > (cherry picked from commit > >> 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5) > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> >> > --- > >> >> > meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +++++++++ > >> >> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > >> >> > create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause > >> >> > > >> >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause > >> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause > >> >> > new file mode 100644 > >> >> > index 0000000..ded8897 > >> >> > --- /dev/null > >> >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause > >> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ > >> >> > + > >> >> > +Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER> > >> >> > +All rights reserved. > >> >> > + > >> >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or > >> without > >> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are > >> met: > >> >> > + > >> >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright > >> notice, > >> this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. > >> >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS > >> IS" > >> AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > >> THE > >> >> > >> >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct? I don't think it makes > >> sense to > >> list > >> >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license. > >> >> > >> >> Maybe a <Organization Here> would be more appropriate. > >> >> > >> > > >> > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g. > >> > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text > >> > >> It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those > >> versions are inconsistent too: > >> > >> We should report that to spdx folks since they > >> Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this > > > > Agreed. I think we need to get the SPDX to fix their examples, and then use > > them once they are fixed. > > > > As for our version of the code, I'd suggest the "<COPYRIGHT HOLDER>" (as in > > the > > BSD-4-clause example) in all cases. > > Agreed. So while Mark and Khem fix up master, is it OK for Armin to > backport the current version to rocko? Or should master and sumo be > updated first?
It should get into master for sure before it hits release branches. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
