On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:52 AM Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Mark Hatle <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 6/15/18 7:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy <[email protected] >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected] >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle <[email protected] >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> >> >> > From: André Draszik <[email protected] >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Some projects are starting to use it. >> >> >> > https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <[email protected] >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <[email protected] >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> >> > (cherry picked from commit >> >> 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5) >> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <[email protected] >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> >> > --- >> >> >> > meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +++++++++ >> >> >> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >> >> >> > create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause >> >> >> > >> >> >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause >> >> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause >> >> >> > new file mode 100644 >> >> >> > index 0000000..ded8897 >> >> >> > --- /dev/null >> >> >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause >> >> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ >> >> >> > + >> >> >> > +Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER> >> >> >> > +All rights reserved. >> >> >> > + >> >> >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or >> >> without >> >> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions >> >> are met: >> >> >> > + >> >> >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright >> >> notice, >> >> this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. >> >> >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS >> >> IS" >> >> AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, >> >> THE >> >> >> >> >> >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct? I don't think it makes >> >> sense to >> >> list >> >> >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license. >> >> >> >> >> >> Maybe a <Organization Here> would be more appropriate. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g. >> >> > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text >> >> >> >> It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those >> >> versions are inconsistent too: >> >> >> >> We should report that to spdx folks since they >> >> Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this >> > >> > Agreed. I think we need to get the SPDX to fix their examples, and then >> > use >> > them once they are fixed. >> > >> > As for our version of the code, I'd suggest the "<COPYRIGHT HOLDER>" (as >> > in the >> > BSD-4-clause example) in all cases. >> >> Agreed. So while Mark and Khem fix up master, is it OK for Armin to >> backport the current version to rocko? Or should master and sumo be >> updated first? > > It should get into master for sure before it hits release branches.
The current version of the BSD-1 license text has been in master since January. It's already been released in sumo. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
