I guess that tells us how many people actually use xcalibrate...

On 12 July 2018 at 15:07, Böszörményi Zoltán via Openembedded-core
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2018-04-04 03:49 keltezéssel, Armin Kuster írta:
>>
>> From: Armin Kuster <akus...@mvista.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akus...@mvista.com>
>> ---
>>   .../xorg-proto/bigreqsproto_1.1.2.bb               | 16 ---------
>>   .../xorg-proto/calibrateproto/fix.patch            | 42
>> ----------------------
>
> ...
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-proto/calibrateproto/fix.patch
>> b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-proto/calibrateproto/fix.patch
>>
>> deleted file mode 100644
>> index ff8cb25..0000000
>> --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-proto/calibrateproto/fix.patch
>> +++ /dev/null
>> @@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
>> -Upstream-Status: Pending
>> -
>> -Add missing length fields to the replies. Without these, sanity checking
>> in recent X
>> -breaks things.
>> -
>> -RP 11/2/10
>> -
>> -
>> -Index: git/xcalibrateproto.h
>> -===================================================================
>> ---- git.orig/xcalibrateproto.h 2010-02-11 11:47:45.711985932 +0000
>> -+++ git/xcalibrateproto.h      2010-02-11 11:40:21.000000000 +0000
>> -@@ -67,13 +67,13 @@
>> -     BYTE    type;   /* X_Reply */
>> -     BYTE    pad1;
>> -     CARD16  sequenceNumber B16;
>> -+    CARD32  length;
>> -     CARD32  status;
>> -     CARD32  pad2 B32;
>> -     CARD32  pad3 B32;
>> -     CARD32  pad4 B32;
>> -     CARD32  pad5 B32;
>> -     CARD32  pad6 B32;
>> --    CARD32  pad7 B32;
>> - } xXCalibrateRawModeReply;
>> -
>> - #define sz_xXCalibrateRawModeReply    32
>> -@@ -92,13 +92,13 @@
>> -     BYTE    type;   /* X_Reply */
>> -     BYTE    pad1;
>> -     CARD16  sequenceNumber B16;
>> -+    CARD32  length;
>> -     CARD32  x;
>> -     CARD32  y;
>> -     CARD32  pad2 B32;
>> -     CARD32  pad3 B32;
>> -     CARD32  pad4 B32;
>> -     CARD32  pad5 B32;
>> --    CARD32  pad6 B32;
>> - } xXCalibrateScreenToCoordReply;
>> -
>> - #define sz_xXCalibrateScreenToCoordReply      32
>
>
> Haven't you just introduced an incompatible change by not adding the
> identical
> patch to [PATCH 17/21] xorgproto: add replacement for depricated
> calibrateproto ?
>
> Best regards,
> Zoltán Böszörményi
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to