On Sat, 2018-09-29 at 10:58 +0800, Chen Qi wrote: > The patch 0031-sysdeps-ieee754-prevent-maybe-uninitialized- > errors.patch > did not take into consideration of qemuppc. Refresh it to also fix > building for qemuppc. > > The related error message is like below: > > ../sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm/e_jnl.c:153:20: error: 'temp' may be > used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] > > Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <[email protected]> > --- > ...eee754-prevent-maybe-uninitialized-errors.patch | 41 > +++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0031-sysdeps-ieee754- > prevent-maybe-uninitialized-errors.patch b/meta/recipes- > core/glibc/glibc/0031-sysdeps-ieee754-prevent-maybe-uninitialized- > errors.patch > index b02c4ec..1c5b254 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0031-sysdeps-ieee754-prevent- > maybe-uninitialized-errors.patch > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0031-sysdeps-ieee754-prevent- > maybe-uninitialized-errors.patch > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -From c6cc5a6ef46837e341fe271b5ffa6def23810082 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > 2001 > +From 113241a738662854256c5e2e415397721b842862 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > 2001 > From: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 23:23:03 +0000 > Subject: [PATCH] sysdeps/ieee754: prevent maybe-uninitialized errors > @@ -21,13 +21,14 @@ Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://www.sourcewar > e.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-09/msg
I get nervous when we modify a patch submitted upstream. Was the patch submitted accepted? Do we need to send this other piece upstream? Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
