I’d say virtual/gtk wouldn’t be helpful much as 2/3/4 versions have major api differences.
Alex > On 20 Jun 2019, at 11.19, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 04:46:16PM +0800, Robert Yang wrote: >> ... >> Maybe gtk+2 is out of date? Since gtk+4 is on the way, so I think that we >> need something like virtual/gtk to fix these problems totally? > > GTK+2 is mostly obsolete. > > I just checked the GTK4 sources, and there it is renamed to > gtk4-update-icon-cache. Based on that I would say that your > patch is actually fine at least for now. > >> // Robert > > cu > Adrian > > -- > > "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out > of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. > "Only a promise," Lao Er said. > Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
