On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 18:02:06 +0200
Max Kellermann <[email protected]> wrote:
> + * wrap_access(int dirfd, const char *path, int mode, int flags) {
This should probably say "faccessat". I know it's just a comment, but
I try to be consistent about these.
> + rc = real___fxstatat64(_STAT_VER, dirfd, path, &buf,
> AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW);
We should probably be using flags here, not AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW.
Or possibly (flags & AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW). Otherwise, we'll get the wrong
results if called with flags not including AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW.
-s
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
