On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 18:02:06 +0200 Max Kellermann <max+openembed...@blarg.de> wrote:
> + * wrap_access(int dirfd, const char *path, int mode, int flags) { This should probably say "faccessat". I know it's just a comment, but I try to be consistent about these. > + rc = real___fxstatat64(_STAT_VER, dirfd, path, &buf, > AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW); We should probably be using flags here, not AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW. Or possibly (flags & AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW). Otherwise, we'll get the wrong results if called with flags not including AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW. -s -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core