On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 8:54 AM Richard Purdie
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> We had interesting failures where building gcc-cross-powerpc with 5.0 kernel
> headers, then building eudev after moving to 5.2 headers failed.
>
> gcc-cross doesn't rebuild when linux-libc-headers changes due to its
> listing in SIGGEN_EXCLUDE_SAFE_RECIPE_DEPS. This shouldn't matter but
> fixincludes as adding asm-generic/socket.h to its filtered list which
> was then replacing the real header with an older version. This mismatch
> lead to build failures.
>
> We trust the Linux kernel headers to be ANSI safe so lets just clear out
> any headers and trust the originals to be correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc 
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc
> index 6222c2e8c91..e417b898734 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc
> @@ -196,6 +196,8 @@ do_install () {
>         # We use libiberty from binutils
>         find ${D}${exec_prefix}/lib -name libiberty.a | xargs rm -f
>         find ${D}${exec_prefix}/lib -name libiberty.h | xargs rm -f
> +
> +       find ${D}${libdir}/gcc/${TARGET_SYS}/${BINV}/include-fixed -type f 
> -not -name "README" -not -name limits.h -not -name syslimits.h | xargs rm -f

Whats different for limits.h and syslimits.h as compared to standard
headers from libc, Maybe we should just get that sorted as well while
here


>  }
>
>  do_package[noexec] = "1"
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to